Top of this document
Go directly to navigation
Go directly to page content
Economist, musician, citizen, in no particular order.
Music and social sciences have always been my main interests. Unable to decide between the two, I decided to pursue both and ended up a strange mixture of folk-world musician and economist interested in human creativity as a development engine.
As an economist, I set myself the goal of contributing to building an economy propelled chiefly by human intelligence - creativity, innovation, culture - rather than physical resources or the exploitation of man over man and nature. I am convinced that this model can emerge from the “perfect storm” under way in the digital economy, and that the music industry and the creative industries in general are a good place to watch it from and, just maybe, to intervene in the process. I have chosen to represent the general interest rather than a single company’s: I am interested in public policy as intelligent participation in collective choice. I work a lot on social networks, both physical and online, as a tool to design and deploy policies. At the moment I am project manager for the Development Policy Unit of the Italian government’s Ministry for Economic Development on the issue of art and creativity as economic development tools.
As a musician I am interested in our common roots, especially those of my native Emilia Romagna region, which I like to expose to a fairly global audience. My main project is digital folk group Fiamma Fumana, active chiefly in North America and northern Europe. I also work with my old friend Cisco and occasionally with some non-Italian world music artists like the British band Transglobal Underground and Danish singer Gudrun Holck. I also am among the founders of Italian folk-rock band Modena City Ramblers, but now I am not involved with them anymore.
you should check out this amazing not-for-profit startup: www.criticalcity.org Also, as you give your talk, Milano is holdin a ...
With all due respect to the other proposal, I would find this workshop more unique if it tried to pull together different people ...
Picking on Ton's point: after disposing of "best practice", even "guidelines" may or may not be the best way to go ...