Top of this document
Go directly to navigation
Go directly to page content

Talk 4 comments

Math is Free as Thought - but do you get it? How?

How do you set an idea free when it is stuck in the minds of experts?

Trust me on this one: The academic world of maths, computer science and logic is full of Great Ideas that could and should be used by practical visionaries (such as yourself and everyone else at Reboot ;-)

The problem is: Which one is it that YOU personally shouldn't have been able to live without hearing about? Binary Decision Diagrams? Linear Programming? Modal logic? Higher-order control-flow analysis? Size-change graphs? The list goes on and on. Getting familiar with just one of these could take months.

The good news: Maths is really a Free World. The patents are few and far between, the technical papers often go straight to open websites, experts take pride in writing Wikipedia articles, and free, open-source software implementing the ideas are legion. So you can get it - but only if you "get it". Because what use is all this free information if you don't understand what it can do for you? You're probably not going to spend a month learning some enigmatic topic just blindly trusting that whatever "Kripke models" are, they should be the basis of all your future projects.

How would you find out where to begin? How would you start drilling into something that is so complex? What the best way to spend six hours if you just want to get a feeling; just want to figure out whether this Idea might be what you were missing? After that, how would you spend a week to explore it further? Would you start at the local library? Play with every demo on the web? Print out 1,000 pages and read them on the couch of your favourite coffee shop? Or shower every forum and chatroom you know with questions? Of course, these questions aren't at all restricted to maths; they apply to most complex ideas, methods and fields.

I've had to climb such mountains before, and I'm doing it at the moment. This time I'm trying to observe myself and make notes while I peel off the layers of another topic I'm learning.

I'm sure that other Rebooters have similar experiences and I'd love to hear what you did, and to discuss what worked and what didn't. I don't believe that there's a silver bullet waiting for us to find, but I do think your approaches differ from mine, and that there could be some quite practical ideas to learn from each other. I volunteer to get the action going with a personal case study or two.

Post scriptum: OK, time to 'fess up. While I'm primarily a practitioner these days, I used to be a researcher and saw the other side of this problem. Research groups come up with these ideas, models, methods, algorithms, and they do everything they can to make them publicly known and freely available. They know that the idea is good and want it to be put to use, but in many cases they do not know whom to call. They built the hammer and hand it out gratis but the people with the nails don't live in the neighborhood. It's also from that frustrated perspective that I am curious to learn about how the "Idea-seekers" of 2008 go about their business.

4 comments

Claus Dahl

I'm obliged to like this as a former Maths major, I guess. Dee-expertising maths would be great, but it is a little dreaming of player pianos "so we could all make music" only to realize that its the intense acoustic scrutiny of the piano-expert, the pianist, that provides the beauty of piano playing.

17 June 08, 12:32 Claus Dahl, 17 June 08, 12:32

I miss maths sooo much !

Did a math phd long time ago. Algorithms and stochastic stuffs.
Math gives you super powers but requires much training, discipline an patience.

19 June 08, 17:52 Alexis Perrier, 19 June 08, 17:52

Brief notes from the discussion

These are my notes. They're too brief to be understood by anyone but myself, they're out of order, and I've probably misunderstood and twisted everybody's points. So please feel free to correct me!

Allan With suggested studying David Snowden.

Claus Dahl pointed out that the real trick is waiting for 100 years. What we learn in high school was expert's stuff 100 years ago, but the language developed.

Claus Dahl also saw experimental mathematics as a way forward.

Someone (sorry, didn't catch your name) saw this a problem of brain-halfs. The idea needs to be communicated from a left-brainer to a right-brainer.

Frederik Smedberg underlined the strength of visualization. Ideas aren't best communicated by the use of words alone.

Thomas Gravgaard noted that academic fields often form their own closed spheres with their own language, and this is part of the problem.

Off camera, I got the below input.

Helena Mischel described the technique she has been using with her study group. A group of three met each day and agree on one simple question that should be answered. They study the question separately and meet to discuss the answer the following day.

Heidi Harman recommended studying Ole Striim.

Daniel de la Rica gave a very exemplary, practical example of the situation we were discussing: The use of splines in a graphical user interface.

30 June 08, 00:41 Niels Christensen, 30 June 08, 00:41

Slides

30 June 08, 22:37 Niels Christensen, 30 June 08, 22:37